WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  


nychammer 8:10 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Watford are a smaller club with greater ambition in terms of net spend compared to us, who have showed relatively little for our size. Results don’t lie and look at watford so far.

theaxeman 4:51 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
alex

No not at all. I would never play Carroll again unless as an impact sub. As soon as he plays the opposition can just walk 15yrds up the pitch and that kills us.

gph 4:37 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Anyone got a link to their first goal?

I suspect that we didn't push up our back line as a line (as we try to do* even at the level I play at, and even when we're in possession).

If you push forward and the whole back line doesn't, the player you're directly opposing can get behind you without being offside.

I sometimes think that Bilic doesn't coach his side well enough in his tactics, and it's that it's more that lack of coaching than the tactics themselves.

E.g., a high back line is a calculated risk, with benefits as well as dangers, a jagged back line amplifies that risk, with no advantages.

*we often fail, with unfortunate consequences

Mad Dog 4:37 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
1964. No. Just 1.

Alex V 4:35 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
rumford 4:28 Sun Sep 24

Well that's a different thing. Should we be in a better place than Watford? Of course. We've spent more, have bigger gates, bigger drawing power to players, higher wages etc. The club have wasted and continue to waste the inbuilt advantages we have over competitors.

But the truth is that ship has sailed. We are where we are. I have no axe to grind with Watford. I don't feel entitled to any better than a Watford supporter. I feel that sort of entitlement needs to be earned by good decision-making from the club. It's absurd to criticise us by comparing us to Watford - it's obvious the level that we're at, just pretending we're somehow better than that because 'we want to be' is childish imo.

rumford 4:28 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Alex v
I'll tell you why we should be better than Watford.
Man utd have a bigger support than us and much higher revenues and that's you would expect them to a achieve more .By the same token we have bigger support than Watford higher revenues.Or is that not our it works mate.

lars 4:16 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Spurs look a real "team" with class players. Kane, Alli, Eriksen and Sissoko work so well together. But Arnoutovic and Hernandez were good for us, and even Masuaku did a job. The fightback was good but came too late. Carroll needs more PL games to get anywhere near the player he can be, and how we missed Antonio when he went off. Mid table mediocrity on what I've seen so far this season.

kylay 4:12 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
The only thing that saw us gain any momentum was the red card (Hernandez goal was completely against the run of play). so if we can just get an opponent sent off in each game we should be fine. We weren't being split open at will when Antonio was on, but we weren't exactly an attacking force either. Thought we were well less than the sum of our parts for 80% of the match. It was good to see some fight and a competitive finish, but it would be nice if it didn't take 70 minutes to get there.

Side of Ham 3:53 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
*play

Side of Ham 3:53 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
We was playing well and not just lumping the ball into the box then Antonio got injured and Bilic brought on Carroll which mean't to me the Spurs defence breathed a sigh of relief as they can take that battering of this sort all day. Sakho should have been brought on to plat Antonio's role to limit the need to punt the ball to Carroll and keep with the plan that was already working and putting them under pressure. Then if we had still gone 2-0 down in the 1st half i would have brought on mid way through the 2nd half.

The change he made to me clearly made it advantageous to Spurs as they are set up to deal with him seeing as most their deep lying defensive players were his size and he was getting pushed out wide a lot just to get on the ball.

dicksie3 3:49 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
I AGREE, ALEX V.

OUR TARGET SHOULD BE TO COMPETE WITH WATFORD FOOTBALL CLUB.

OUR OWNERS DO A FUCKING GOOD JOB WITH IT AS WELL BY SPENDING THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY AS THEM - DESPITE PROMISING THE WORLD - EVEN THOUGH WE GET ALMOST THREE TIMES THE SIZE GATES AS WATFORD FOOTBALL CLUB.

I, FOR ONE, AM DELIGHTED TO BE THE EQUALS OF WATFORD FOOTBALL CLUB.

YOU MAKE A FAIR POINT. ALWAYS DO, IN FACT.

Alex V 3:44 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
I don't really understand these Watford comments. What makes anyone think we have a right to be considered a healthier club than them, other than hubris?

dicksie3 3:42 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
IF I WAS A WATFORD FOOTBALL CLUB FAN - AND WE HAD NEARLY COME BACK FROM 0-3 DOWN TO DRAW AND SOMEHOW PULLED-IN 57K FANS INTO OUR 20K BIKE SHED WANKER GROUND - THEN I WOULD BE VERY UPBEAT.

OUR OWNERS LOVE TO CONVINCE US THAT WE ARE IN FACT FUCKING WATFORD FOOTBALL CLUB AND QUITE A FEW OF OUR FANS ACTUALLY GO ALONG WITH IT.

Alex V 3:38 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
And then when we concede goals playing Sakho and Hernandez up front we blame them and choose another combo?

theaxeman 3:36 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Im blaming bilic for bringing on carroll and carroll for being fucking hopeless. Bilic needs to swallow and get Sakho and Hernandez up front

1964 3:19 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Are you blameing the ref for our defence letting in 3 goals.

Mad Dog 3:19 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Just seen goals on Sunday. I thought we were hard done by a little with refs not booking their players at the time. Now I've seen it in detail we were absolutely stitched up. 3 penalties And first one was offside as he gained an advantage and it wasn't 2nd phase.

Now I'm all pissed off again

Keep dreaming 2:56 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Good match, nothing to complain about expect from the ref decisions. Good comeback against a good team.
Lets build on this!

cholo 2:41 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
I know we have obvious deficiencies and I'm offering no excuses, but we were still stitched up by some crap officiating, an offside goal and more than one decent penalty shout, same old story.

chim chim cha boo 2:12 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
Penners,

And just one dick and my auntie would have been my uncle.

penners28 2:01 Sun Sep 24
Re: ⚽ West Ham v Tottenham- Official Match Thread FT 2-3 Att: 56,988
I think played well. Ayew or sakho for antonio was the change though, although hernandez was getting nothing from a world class defensive 3.

I honestly cant see how slav can get knocked though. 10 more mins and we'd have nicked a 3rd

Prev - Page 2 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: